Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VCIT vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VCIT returned −1.8% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VCIT and VPL

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $66.6bn for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF and $9.0bn for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
−1.8%
VCIT total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.03%
VCIT expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCIT costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.6 points; VCIT is 7.4 times larger.

VCIT vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVCITVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.8%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.2%, high on Feb 27, 20267.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond IndexFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.07%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$66.6bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, VCIT and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VCIT VPL
MKTLIQ 0.58% 0.00%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VCIT
Amazon.com Inc 0.29%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.28%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.27%
Boeing Co 0.27%
Bank of America Corp 0.27%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.26%
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc 0.26%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.25%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year −1.8% +24.8%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.8% (SCHI) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs SCHI not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.07%
Holdings 2340 2343
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $66.6bn $9.0bn

VCIT and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VCIT

VCIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.8% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VCIT or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VCIT returned −1.8% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, VCIT or VPL?
VCIT is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VCIT against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vcit-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.