Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VCIT vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VCIT returned −1.8% to VHT's +25.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VCIT and VHT

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $66.6bn for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF and $19.1bn for Vanguard Health Care ETF.

At a glance
−1.8%
VCIT total return, 1 year
+25.0%
VHT total return, 1 year
0.03%
VCIT expense ratio
0.09%
VHT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCIT costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.8 points; VCIT is 3.5 times larger.

VCIT vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVCITVHT
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.8%+25.0%
Drawdown
Below its high3.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$66.6bn$19.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight86%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, VCIT and VHT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VCIT VHT
MKTLIQ 0.58% 0.24%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VCIT
Amazon.com Inc 0.29%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.28%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.27%
Boeing Co 0.27%
Bank of America Corp 0.27%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.26%
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc 0.26%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.25%
Only in VHT
Eli Lilly & Co 12.95%
Johnson & Johnson 8.79%
AbbVie Inc 6.46%
Merck & Co Inc 5.02%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 4.66%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.51%
Amgen Inc 3.18%
Gilead Sciences Inc 2.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Tracks an index of Health Care
Total return, 1 year −1.8% +25.0%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.8% (SCHI) +25.4% (FHLC)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs SCHI −0.4 pts vs FHLC
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.09%
Holdings 2340 414
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $66.6bn $19.1bn

VCIT and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VCIT

VCIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.8% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VHT

VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VCIT or VHT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VCIT returned −1.8% and VHT +25.0%.
Which is cheaper, VCIT or VHT?
VCIT is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VCIT against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vcit-vs-vht

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.