Which returned more over the last year, VCIT or XLV?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VCIT returned −1.2% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, VCIT or XLV?

VCIT charges 0.03% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so VCIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VCIT vs XLV: how they differ

VCIT and XLV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLV returned more over the year.

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VCIT and XLV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VCIT	Only in XLV
Amazon.com Inc 0.31%	ELI LILLY + CO 14.87%
Boeing Co/The 0.28%	JOHNSON + JOHNSON 10.73%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.28%	ABBVIE INC 7.54%
Bank of America Corp 0.27%	MERCK + CO. INC. 5.98%
Oracle Corp 0.27%	UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 5.90%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%	THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 3.75%
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.27%	AMGEN INC 3.46%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.25%	ABBOTT LABORATORIES 3.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

VCIT and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund	XLV State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	State Street
What it is	Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond	Health care
Total return, 1 year	−1.2%	+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.7 pts	+2.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.08%
Holdings	2302	63

VCIT in plain words

VCIT is a bond fund tracking the Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 63 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VCIT or XLV?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VCIT returned −1.2% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VCIT or XLV?: VCIT charges 0.03% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so VCIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VCIT against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VCIT against XLV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vcit-vs-xlv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources