Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
VB vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VB returned +14.4% to XLG's +6.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about VB and XLG
Net assets: $76.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF, and $11.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
Pair scorecard
VB costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.0 points.
| Measure | VB | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +6.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morningstar US Small Cap Index | S&P 500 Top 50 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, VB as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026 | $76.9bn | $11.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 5.9% | 60.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, VB and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
VB and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VB
VB tracks an index of Small-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,303 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLG
XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VB or XLG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VB returned +14.4% and XLG +6.4%.
- Which is cheaper, VB or XLG?
- VB is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, VB against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vb-vs-xlg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). VB against XLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vb-vs-xlg
[VB against XLG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vb-vs-xlg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.