Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWC vs XLG: how they differ
IWC and XLG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWC returned more over the year.
iShares Micro-Cap ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWC and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWC | Only in XLG |
|---|---|
| CAREDX 0.61% | NVIDIA Corp 12.79% |
| SELLAS LIFE SCIENCES GROUP INC 0.60% | Apple Inc 11.58% |
| NURIX THERAPEUTICS 0.59% | Microsoft Corp 8.83% |
| PENGUIN SOLUTIONS INC 0.58% | Amazon.com Inc 5.95% |
| OUSTER 0.52% | Alphabet Inc 4.71% |
| VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS 0.48% | Broadcom Inc 4.12% |
| INTERFACE 0.47% | Alphabet Inc 3.77% |
| MBX BIOSCIENCES 0.45% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | Russell Microcap | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.3% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.8 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.9% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 1252 | 52 |
IWC in plain words
IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1252 positions, with the top ten at 5.1%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +31.3% and XLG returned +12.2%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- How much do IWC and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWC and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWC against XLG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-xlg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources