Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLT returned −7.9% to XLK's +27.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and XLK

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF and $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 35.0 points; XLK is 2.6 times larger.

TLT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTXLK
Return
Total return, 1 year−7.9%+27.1%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 20205.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond IndexTechnology Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$47.4bn$125.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TLT XLK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Only in XLK
NVIDIA CORP 15.22%
APPLE INC 14.62%
MICROSOFT CORP 11.38%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.78%
BROADCOM INC 4.70%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.02%
INTEL CORP 2.72%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 2.67%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year −7.9% +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −7.8% (BBLB) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.08%
Holdings 47 76
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $47.4bn $125.0bn

TLT and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT and XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or XLK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −7.9% and XLK +27.1%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or XLK?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.