Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs USMV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLT returned −7.9% to USMV's +10.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and USMV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF and $24.1bn for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.

At a glance
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
+10.8%
USMV total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.15%
USMV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 18.7 points; TLT is 2.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

TLT vs USMV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTUSMV
Return
Total return, 1 year−7.9%+10.8%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond IndexMSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$47.4bn$24.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight93%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and USMV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TLT USMV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Only in USMV
MICROSOFT 1.61%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.54%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.50%
CHUBB 1.50%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 1.48%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 1.47%
NVIDIA 1.47%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.44%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Tracks the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor
Total return, 1 year −7.9% +10.8%
Its benchmark over the same days −7.8% (BBLB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Holdings 47 176
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $47.4bn $24.1bn

TLT and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT and USMV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

USMV

USMV tracks the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.8% with distributions reinvested. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 176 positions, with the top ten at 14.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or USMV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −7.9% and USMV +10.8%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or USMV?
Neither: TLT and USMV both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against USMV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-usmv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.