Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and TLT
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $47.4bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
TLT costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points; TLT is 1.8 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | −7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $47.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 78% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or TLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and TLT −7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or TLT?
- TLT is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tlt
[CGGR against TLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.