TCHP vs VUG: Differences, Returns & Fees
TCHP and VUG hold 64% of their weight in the same names, and VUG returned +10.2% over the year. Net assets: $2.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $232.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF.
VUG costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.8 points.
| TCHP | VUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, TCHP as of Oct 20, 2026 and VUG as of Sep 30, 2026 | $2.2bn | $232.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.4% | +10.2% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Morningstar US Large Cap Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 64% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.7% | 63.1% |
| Below its high | 5.1%, high on Jun 1, 2026 | 4.3%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
TCHP and VUG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. TCHP follows No index, actively managed and VUG follows Morningstar US Large Cap Growth Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 TCHP returned +2.4% and VUG +10.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.8 points.
- Cost. TCHP charges 0.57% of assets a year and VUG 0.03%, a gap of 0.54 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TCHP and VUG hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
64% in common
On the same fields
TCHP and VUG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About TCHP
TCHP is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 56.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
About VUG
VUG tracks an index of US growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 137 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, TCHP or VUG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TCHP returned +2.4% and VUG +10.2%.
- Which is cheaper, TCHP or VUG?
- VUG is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, TCHP against VUG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tchp-vs-vug
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). TCHP against VUG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tchp-vs-vug
[TCHP against VUG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tchp-vs-vug)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.