Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYD vs SPYM: how they differ

SPYD and SPYM hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and SPYM returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYD and SPYM hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYD and SPYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYDSPYM
CHEVRON CORP1.43%0.61%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC1.46%0.32%
PEPSICO INC1.30%0.28%
AT+T INC1.43%0.27%
PFIZER INC1.44%0.24%
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO1.36%0.20%
MEDTRONIC PLC1.45%0.18%
ALTRIA GROUP INC1.23%0.17%
ACCENTURE PLC CL A1.64%0.17%
US BANCORP1.25%0.15%
BLACKSTONE INC1.32%0.14%
DUKE ENERGY CORP1.21%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYDOnly in SPYM
S+P500 EMINI FUT SEP26 0.00%NVIDIA CORP 8.07%
APPLE INC 7.32%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.58%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.76%
ALPHABET INC CL A 2.98%
BROADCOM INC 2.61%
ALPHABET INC CL C 2.38%
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 2.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SPYD and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
SPYM
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High DividendS&P 500
Total return, 1 year+12.9%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.6 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.07%1.30%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings81507

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPYM in plain words

SPYM is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYD or SPYM?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYD returned +12.9% and SPYM returned +17.6%, so SPYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYD or SPYM?
SPYD charges 0.07% a year and SPYM charges 1.30%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYD and SPYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYD and 100% of SPYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYD against SPYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYD against SPYM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spyd-vs-spym Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources