Which returned more over the last year, SLV or VGT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SLV returned +53.8% and VGT returned +35.4%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, SLV or VGT?

SLV charges 0.50% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SLV vs VGT: how they differ

SLV is a commodity fund and VGT an equity index fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against +35.4%.

iShares Silver Trust and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

SLV and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	SLV iShares Silver Trust	VGT Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Silver	Information technology
Total return, 1 year	+53.8%	+35.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+36.3 pts	+17.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.09%
Holdings	not filed	317

SLV in plain words

SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SLV or VGT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SLV returned +53.8% and VGT returned +35.4%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SLV or VGT?: SLV charges 0.50% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SLV against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SLV against VGT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/slv-vs-vgt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources