A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

SDCI vs USCI: Differences, Returns & Fees

SDCI is an actively managed commodity fund and USCI a commodity futures fund, and over the year they finished level, +44.1% against +43.7%. Net assets on Oct 14, 2026: $820m for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund and $419m for United States Commodity Index Fund ETV.

SDCI costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; SDCI is 2.0 times larger.

SDCI vs USCI: Differences, Returns & Fees
SDCIUSCI
Expense ratio0.60%1.05%
Net assets$820m$419m
Total return, 1 year+44.1%+43.7%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBroad futures
Holdings in commonnot published
+44.1%
SDCI total return, 1 year
+43.7%
USCI total return, 1 year
0.60%
SDCI expense ratio
1.05%
USCI expense ratio
Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-1A0A934CCF

SDCI and USCI are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. SDCI follows No index, actively managed and USCI follows Broad futures.
  2. Cost. SDCI charges 0.60% of assets a year and USCI 1.05%, a gap of 0.45 points.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 14, 2026 SDCI returned +44.1% and USCI +43.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.4 points.

Data as of Oct 14, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund ETV
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer USCF USCF
What it is Actively managed Holds broad futures
Total return, 1 year +44.1% +43.7%
Expense ratio 0.60% 1.05%
Holdings 0 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets $820m $419m

SDCI and USCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 14, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About SDCI

SDCI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 14, 2026 it returned +44.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year.

About USCI

USCI holds broad futures. Over the year to Oct 14, 2026 it returned +43.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.05% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDCI or USCI?
In the year to Oct 14, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDCI returned +44.1% and USCI +43.7%.
Which is cheaper, SDCI or USCI?
SDCI is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
FAAR vs SDCIGSG vs SDCICOMB vs SDCICERY vs SDCIGSG vs USCICERY vs USCICOMT vs USCIDBC vs USCI
SDCI on its own →USCI on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
SDCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SDCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗USCF website ↗USCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SDCI against USCI, data as of Oct 14, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sdci-vs-usci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.