Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
SCHG vs XME: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHG returned +6.8% to XME's +3.4%, and SCHG charges 0.04% to XME's 0.35%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCHG and XME
Net assets: $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, and $3.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points.
| Measure | SCHG | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.8% | +3.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Below its all-time high | 23.6%, high on Jun 2, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | Miners and metals |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 10.3 pts | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 10.3 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 and XME as of Oct 27, 2026 | $63.0bn | $3.8bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.0% | 53% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 879 weekly returns · each against IVVSCHG returned more: +1,156.7% to +140.9%. SCHG swung less: 18.5% to 33.3%. SCHG fell less at its worst: −34.2% to −82.6%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | SCHG | XME | IVV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +1,156.7% | +140.9% | SCHG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +16.2% | +5.3% | SCHG | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +988.8% | +93.4% | SCHG | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 18.5% | 33.3% | SCHG | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 12.5% | 22.8% | SCHG | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −34.2% | −82.6% | SCHG | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 121.1% | 131.5% | 100.0% | XME (slight) | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 108.1% | 125.5% | 100.0% | SCHG | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.10 | 1.38 | 1.00 | SCHG lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.92 | 0.45 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.82 | 0.28 | SCHG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.22 | 0.40 | SCHG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.138 | 0.067 | 0.130 | SCHG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.47 | 0.06 | SCHG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | IVV | IVV | IVV | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.8% a year | −8.7% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.65 | −1.44 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −1.7% to +3.4% | −20.6% to +3.2% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | 0.40 | −0.15 | SCHG | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 5.5% | 25.5% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 879 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and XME hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
SCHG and XME on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG and XME do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index and XME follows Miners and metals.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SCHG returned +6.8% and XME +3.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XME
By weight, 21% of XME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 38 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. It sits 23.6% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are SCHG and XME in the same category?
- SCHG is a stock ETF and XME is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or XME?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +6.8% and XME +3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or XME?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHG against XME, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-xme
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). SCHG against XME. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-xme
[SCHG against XME (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-xme)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.