Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHD vs VTV: how they differ

SCHD and VTV hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHD and VTV hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHD and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHDVTV
UnitedHealth Group Inc5.10%1.42%
Home Depot Inc/The3.37%1.32%
Procter & Gamble Co/The3.55%1.28%
Merck & Co Inc3.87%1.19%
Chevron Corp3.84%1.18%
Coca-Cola Co/The3.96%1.05%
Amgen Inc3.48%0.73%
QUALCOMM Inc6.75%0.73%
PepsiCo Inc3.45%0.70%
Verizon Communications Inc3.66%0.60%
Abbott Laboratories2.97%0.59%
Texas Instruments Inc5.92%0.51%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHDOnly in VTV
Accenture PLC 2.90%Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
Fastenal Co 1.28%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
Ares Management Corp 0.67%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
East West Bancorp Inc 0.42%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
Best Buy Co Inc 0.38%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
APA Corp 0.33%Walmart Inc 1.87%
Watsco Inc 0.32%Caterpillar Inc 1.84%
Fidelity National Financial Inc 0.30%AbbVie Inc 1.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHD and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS dividendUS value
Total return, 1 year+27.6%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+10.1 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50095.1%98.6%
Holdings99308

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHD or VTV?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHD returned +27.6% and VTV returned +22.9%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHD or VTV?
SCHD charges 0.06% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHD and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHD and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHD against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHD against VTV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schd-vs-vtv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources