Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SCHB vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHB returned +13.4% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SCHB and TLT

Net assets: $44.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF, and $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+13.4%
SCHB total return, 1 year
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.03%
SCHB expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHB costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.3 points.

SCHB vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHBTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.4%−7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksDow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market IndexICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
Net assets, SCHB as of Aug 31, 2026 and TLT as of Oct 27, 2026$44.6bn$47.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight88%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund33.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, SCHB and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SCHB TLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SCHB
NVIDIA Corp 7.20%
Apple Inc 6.27%
Microsoft Corp 5.08%
Amazon.com Inc 3.42%
Alphabet Inc 2.68%
Broadcom Inc 2.36%
Alphabet Inc 2.13%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.69%
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US broad market Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +13.4% −7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −7.8% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.15%
Holdings 2372 47
Net assets, SCHB as of Aug 31, 2026 and TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 $44.6bn $47.4bn

SCHB and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SCHB

SCHB tracks an index of US broad market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,372 positions, with the top ten at 33.7%.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHB or TLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHB returned +13.4% and TLT −7.9%.
Which is cheaper, SCHB or TLT?
SCHB is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SCHB against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schb-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.