Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SCHA vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHA returned +17.8% to SCHG's +6.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SCHA and SCHG

Net assets on Aug 31, 2026: $22.6bn for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF and $63.0bn for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+17.8%
SCHA total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.03%
SCHA expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHA costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.0 points; SCHG is 2.8 times larger.

SCHA vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHASCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.9%, high on Jun 30, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksDow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.04%
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026$22.6bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund10.1%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 879 weekly returns · each against IVV
SCHA SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +522.0% +1,156.7%
Annualized edge SCHG +11.4% +16.2%
Price return edge SCHG +391.8% +988.8%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHG 21.1% 18.5%
Max drawdown edge SCHG −40.9% −34.2%
Downside capture 111.1% 108.1%
Beta 1.17 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG 0.55 0.82
Sortino edge SCHG 0.79 1.22
Treynor 0.099 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.28 0.47
Against the benchmark
Alpha −3.6% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.57 0.65
Information ratio −0.15 0.40
Tracking error 9.9% 5.5%
Reading

SCHG returned more: +1,156.7% to +522.0%. SCHG swung less: 18.5% to 21.1%. SCHG fell less at its worst: −34.2% to −40.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SCHA vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHASCHGIVVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+522.0%+1,156.7%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.4%+16.2%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+391.8%+988.8%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.1%18.5%SCHGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.6%12.5%SCHGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.9%−34.2%SCHGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture113.7%121.1%100.0%SCHG (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.1%108.1%100.0%SCHG (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.171.101.00SCHG lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.800.921.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.550.82SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.791.22SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0990.1380.130SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.280.47SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVIVVIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−3.6% a year+0.8% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.570.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−8.2% to +0.9%−1.7% to +3.4%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.150.40SCHGReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.9%5.5%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 879 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, SCHA and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SCHA SCHG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SCHA
Sandisk Corp 4.87%
Lumentum Holdings Inc 1.49%
Revolution Medicines Inc 0.86%
ATI Inc 0.58%
Coeur Mining Inc 0.45%
Guardant Health Inc 0.44%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc 0.36%
MKS Inc 0.36%
Only in SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 10.67%
Apple Inc 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 7.52%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 3.97%
Broadcom Inc 3.50%
Alphabet Inc 3.16%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Schwab Schwab
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +17.8% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (IVV) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +4.1 pts vs IVV −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 6.6% 94.7%
Holdings 1705 192
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026 $22.6bn $63.0bn

SCHA and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-15F51F6EAF

SCHA and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. SCHA follows Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SCHA returned +17.8% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SCHA

SCHA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,705 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHA or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHA returned +17.8% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, SCHA or SCHG?
SCHA is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHA and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of SCHA and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SCHA against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/scha-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.