Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWC vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWC returned +16.5% to SCHG's +6.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWC and SCHG
Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Micro-Cap ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.7 points.
| Measure | IWC | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.5% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell Microcap Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, IWC as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $1.2bn | $63.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 5.9% | 51.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWC and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWC and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +16.5% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IWC or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWC against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWC against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-schg
[IWC against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.