Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RSP vs XLV: how they differ

RSP and XLV hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and XLV returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RSP and XLV hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RSP and XLV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRSPXLV
Moderna Inc0.58%0.81%
Veeva Systems Inc0.31%0.66%
IQVIA Holdings Inc0.27%0.72%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc0.26%1.33%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.24%3.75%
Merck & Co Inc0.24%5.98%
Becton Dickinson & Co0.23%0.81%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.23%3.01%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.23%2.19%
Incyte Corp0.23%0.35%
Revvity Inc0.23%0.23%
Abbott Laboratories0.23%3.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RSPOnly in XLV
Zebra Technologies Corp 0.31%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.19%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.29%US DOLLAR 0.02%
Valero Energy Corp 0.29%XAV HEALTH CARE SEP26 0.01%
Phillips 66 0.28%CONTRA HOLOGIC INCORPO 0.00%
Salesforce Inc 0.28%
Global Payments Inc 0.28%
Genuine Parts Co 0.27%
Dell Technologies Inc 0.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

RSP and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
XLV
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isS&P 500 equal weightHealth care
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.7 pts+2.9 pts
Expense ratio0.20%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50099.1%100.0%
Holdings50663

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 63 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSP or XLV?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RSP or XLV?
RSP charges 0.20% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSP and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RSP against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against XLV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-xlv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources