Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RSP vs XLI: how they differ

RSP and XLI hold 16% of their weight in the same names.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RSP and XLI hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RSP and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRSPXLI
Deere & Co0.23%3.18%
Allegion plc0.23%0.24%
Stanley Black & Decker Inc0.23%0.26%
Automatic Data Processing Inc0.22%1.98%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc0.22%0.36%
Jacobs Solutions Inc0.22%0.31%
Expeditors International of Washington I0.22%0.46%
Paychex Inc0.22%0.69%
Veralto Corp0.22%0.43%
RTX Corp0.22%4.98%
Cintas Corp0.21%1.26%
Nordson Corp0.21%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RSPOnly in XLI
Moderna Inc 0.58%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.07%
Veeva Systems Inc 0.31%US DOLLAR 0.03%
Zebra Technologies Corp 0.31%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.29%
Valero Energy Corp 0.29%
Charles River Laboratories International 0.28%
Phillips 66 0.28%
Salesforce Inc 0.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

RSP and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isS&P 500 equal weightIndustrials
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.7 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.20%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50099.1%100.0%
Holdings50685

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 40.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSP or XLI?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and XLI returned +14.3%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RSP or XLI?
RSP charges 0.20% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSP and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RSP against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against XLI, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-xli Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources