Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RSP vs XLP: how they differ

RSP and XLP hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RSP and XLP hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RSP and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRSPXLP
Target Corp0.24%4.62%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The0.22%1.56%
Dollar General Corp0.22%1.77%
Dollar Tree Inc0.21%1.40%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co0.21%2.73%
General Mills Inc0.21%1.25%
Coca-Cola Co/The0.20%7.44%
Sysco Corp0.20%2.57%
Philip Morris International Inc0.20%6.47%
J M Smucker Co/The0.20%0.84%
Kraft Heinz Co/The0.20%1.36%
McCormick & Co Inc/MD0.20%0.85%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RSPOnly in XLP
Moderna Inc 0.58%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.18%
Veeva Systems Inc 0.31%US DOLLAR 0.03%
Zebra Technologies Corp 0.31%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.29%
Valero Energy Corp 0.29%
Charles River Laboratories International 0.28%
Phillips 66 0.28%
Salesforce Inc 0.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

RSP and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isS&P 500 equal weightConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.7 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.20%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50099.1%100.0%
Holdings50636

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 36 positions, with the top ten at 62.5%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSP or XLP?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and XLP returned +6.3%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RSP or XLP?
RSP charges 0.20% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSP and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RSP against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against XLP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-xlp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources