Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
RSP vs XHB: how they differ
RSP and XHB hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RSP and XHB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | RSP | XHB |
|---|---|---|
| Allegion plc | 0.23% | 4.42% |
| Williams-Sonoma Inc | 0.21% | 4.08% |
| Johnson Controls International plc | 0.20% | 3.87% |
| PulteGroup Inc | 0.19% | 3.71% |
| Trane Technologies PLC | 0.19% | 3.70% |
| NVR Inc | 0.19% | 3.65% |
| Home Depot Inc/The | 0.19% | 3.62% |
| Masco Corp | 0.18% | 3.61% |
| DR Horton Inc | 0.18% | 3.49% |
| Lowe's Cos Inc | 0.18% | 3.44% |
| Lennar Corp | 0.17% | 3.27% |
| Carrier Global Corp | 0.16% | 3.15% |
| Only in RSP | Only in XHB |
|---|---|
| Moderna Inc 0.58% | OWENS CORNING 4.18% |
| Veeva Systems Inc 0.31% | CHAMPION HOMES INC 3.94% |
| Zebra Technologies Corp 0.31% | INSTALLED BUILDING PRODUCTS 3.90% |
| Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.29% | CARLISLE COS INC 3.80% |
| Valero Energy Corp 0.29% | ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN 3.71% |
| Charles River Laboratories International 0.28% | SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC 3.65% |
| Phillips 66 0.28% | TOLL BROTHERS INC 3.60% |
| Salesforce Inc 0.28% | CAVCO INDUSTRIES INC 3.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | XHB State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500 equal weight | SPDR S&P Homebuilders |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | −16.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −2.7 pts | −34.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 99.1% | 45.7% |
| Holdings | 506 | 35 |
RSP in plain words
RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XHB in plain words
XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 39.3%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RSP or XHB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and XHB returned −16.6%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, RSP or XHB?
- RSP charges 0.20% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do RSP and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against XHB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-xhb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources