Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RSP vs SPYD: how they differ

RSP and SPYD hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RSP and SPYD hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RSP and SPYD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRSPSPYD
HP Inc0.26%1.69%
Mosaic Co/The0.25%1.44%
Target Corp0.24%1.46%
Best Buy Co Inc0.23%1.31%
Stanley Black & Decker Inc0.23%1.29%
Amcor PLC0.22%1.29%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co0.22%1.36%
Medtronic PLC0.22%1.45%
Paychex Inc0.22%1.34%
Prudential Financial Inc0.22%1.29%
Chevron Corp0.22%1.43%
AT&T Inc0.21%1.43%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RSPOnly in SPYD
Moderna Inc 0.58%FALCON TOPCO INC 1.35%
Veeva Systems Inc 0.31%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.36%
Zebra Technologies Corp 0.31%S+P500 EMINI FUT SEP26 0.00%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.29%
Valero Energy Corp 0.29%
Charles River Laboratories International 0.28%
Phillips 66 0.28%
Salesforce Inc 0.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

RSP and SPYD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isS&P 500 equal weightSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.7 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.20%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50099.1%100.0%
Holdings50681

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSP or SPYD?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and SPYD returned +12.9%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RSP or SPYD?
RSP charges 0.20% a year and SPYD charges 0.07%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSP and SPYD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 100% of SPYD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RSP against SPYD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against SPYD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-spyd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources