Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
RSP vs SPHD: how they differ
RSP and SPHD hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RSP and SPHD hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | RSP | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| Genuine Parts Co | 0.27% | 1.81% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 0.22% | 2.08% |
| ConocoPhillips | 0.22% | 1.67% |
| Medtronic PLC | 0.22% | 1.85% |
| Paychex Inc | 0.22% | 2.13% |
| Prudential Financial Inc | 0.22% | 2.31% |
| Chevron Corp | 0.22% | 2.11% |
| AT&T Inc | 0.21% | 2.70% |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 0.21% | 1.45% |
| Hasbro Inc | 0.21% | 1.56% |
| Franklin Templeton Inc | 0.21% | 1.86% |
| Pfizer Inc | 0.21% | 3.38% |
| Only in RSP | Only in SPHD |
|---|---|
| Moderna Inc 0.58% | CME E Mini Health Care Select Sector Fut 0.15% |
| Veeva Systems Inc 0.31% | E-mini S&P Real Estate Select Sector Sto 0.14% |
| Zebra Technologies Corp 0.31% | CME E Mini Consumer Staples Select Secto 0.12% |
| Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.29% | CME E Mini Energy Select Sector Futures 0.05% |
| Valero Energy Corp 0.29% | |
| Charles River Laboratories International 0.28% | |
| Phillips 66 0.28% | |
| Salesforce Inc 0.28% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | SPHD Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | Invesco |
| What it is | S&P 500 equal weight | S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +8.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −2.7 pts | −8.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 99.1% | 95.7% |
| Holdings | 506 | 56 |
RSP in plain words
RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPHD in plain words
SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 28.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RSP or SPHD?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, RSP or SPHD?
- RSP charges 0.20% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do RSP and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against SPHD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-sphd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources