Which returned more over the last year, RSBT or VOO?

In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSBT returned +17.9% and VOO returned +16.6%, so RSBT returned more.

Which is cheaper, RSBT or VOO?

RSBT charges 1.01% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are RSBT and VOO the same kind of fund?

No. RSBT is an alternatives ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 19, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RSBT vs VOO: how they differ

Over the year RSBT returned more, +17.9% to VOO's +16.6%, and VOO charges 0.03% to RSBT's 1.01%.

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.

RSBT and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 19, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits	Alternatives ETF	Core fund
Issuer	Return Stacked	Vanguard
What it is	Managed futures	Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year	+17.9%	+16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.3 pts	0.0 pts
Expense ratio	1.01%	0.03%
Holdings	not filed	508
Net assets	$127m	$1000.0bn

RSBT in plain words

RSBT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.39 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.34, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.34% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks RSBT fell 0.11% on average, a down-week capture of 9.2%. Over the same 52 weeks RSBT returned +18.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 14.4 percentage points ahead of cash.

VOO in plain words

VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 37.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSBT or VOO?: In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSBT returned +17.9% and VOO returned +16.6%, so RSBT returned more.
Which is cheaper, RSBT or VOO?: RSBT charges 1.01% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are RSBT and VOO the same kind of fund?: No. RSBT is an alternatives ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RSBT against VOO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 19, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSBT against VOO, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsbt-vs-voo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources