Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QQQ vs RSBT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QQQ returned +12.3% to RSBT's +7.9%, and QQQ charges 0.18% to RSBT's 1.01%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QQQ and RSBT

Net assets: $464.6bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, and $135m on Jul 31, 2026 for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF.

At a glance
+12.3%
QQQ total return, 1 year
+7.9%
RSBT total return, 1 year
0.18%
QQQ expense ratio
1.01%
RSBT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQ costs 0.83 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.4 points.

QQQ vs RSBT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQRSBT
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.3%+7.9%
Total return, 52 weeks+8.0%
Drawdown
Below its high8.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq-100 Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%1.01%
Net assets, QQQ as of Nov 3, 2026 and RSBT as of Jul 31, 2026$464.6bn$135m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.52
Beta to the S&P 500+0.52: about 0.52% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.80%
Down-week capture74.4%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks the Nasdaq-100 Managed futures
Total return, 1 year +12.3% +7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +12.3% (QQQM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs QQQM not measured
Expense ratio 0.18% 1.01%
Holdings 103 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, QQQ as of Nov 3, 2026 and RSBT as of Jul 31, 2026 $464.6bn $135m

QQQ and RSBT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

QQQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QQQ

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +12.3% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

RSBT

RSBT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.52 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.52, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.52% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks RSBT fell 0.80% on average, a down-week capture of 74.4%. Over the same 52 weeks RSBT returned +8.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 4.4 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are QQQ and RSBT in the same category?
QQQ is a stock ETF and RSBT is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or RSBT?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +12.3% and RSBT +7.9%.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSBT?
QQQ is cheaper, by 0.83 percentage points a year. That is about $83 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQQ against RSBT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqq-vs-rsbt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.