A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

RPV vs SMIG: how they differ

RPV and SMIG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RPV returned +22.2% over the year. Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF.

RPV costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.5 points; RPV is 1.1 times larger.

RPVSMIG
Expense ratio0.35%0.60%
Net assets, RPV as of Oct 9, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026$1.7bn$1.5bn
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+9.7%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.6%42.3%
Below its high4.4%, high on Sep 3, 20266.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+22.2%
RPV total return, 1 year
+9.7%
SMIG total return, 1 year
0.35%
RPV expense ratio
0.60%
SMIG expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RPV and SMIG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding RPV SMIG
Hartford Insurance Group Inc/The 0.38% 2.67%
Only in RPV
Centene Corp 2.69%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 2.52%
Valero Energy Corp 2.39%
Humana Inc 2.36%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 2.34%
Phillips 66 2.19%
Bunge Global SA 2.17%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.14%
Only in SMIG
Silicon Motion Technology Corp 6.66%
Targa Resources Corp 4.89%
Snap-on Inc 4.70%
Victory Capital Holdings Inc 4.30%
DT Midstream Inc 4.19%
Hubbell Inc 4.01%
Gildan Activewear Inc 3.78%
Packaging Corp of America 3.30%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

RPV
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
SMIG
Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Invesco Bahl & Gaynor
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +22.2% +9.7%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +5.0 pts −7.6 pts
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.60%
Already in the S&P 500 99.1% 35.4%
Holdings 120 38
Net assets, RPV as of Oct 9, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026 $1.7bn $1.5bn

RPV and SMIG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

RPV in plain words

RPV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 120 positions, with the top ten at 22.6%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

SMIG in plain words

SMIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 35% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 38 positions, with the top ten at 42.3%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RPV or SMIG?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RPV returned +22.2% and SMIG +9.7%.
Which is cheaper, RPV or SMIG?
RPV is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $25. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RPV and SMIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RPV and 35% of SMIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
DHS vs RPVRPV vs SDOGFEX vs RPVRPV vs RWKDHS vs SMIGILCV vs SMIGFTA vs SMIGIVOV vs SMIG
RPV on its own →SMIG on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
RPV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗RPV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for RPV ↗SMIG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SMIG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, RPV against SMIG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rpv-vs-smig

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.