Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
RDVY vs XLI: how they differ
RDVY and XLI hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and XLI hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | RDVY | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova Inc. | 2.24% | 4.64% |
| Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.98% | 1.98% |
| GE Aerospace | 1.88% | 6.32% |
| PACCAR Inc | 1.01% | 1.21% |
| Dover Corporation | 0.44% | 0.47% |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.44% | 1.70% |
| Veralto Corporation | 1.76% | 0.43% |
| Snap-on Incorporated | 1.89% | 0.36% |
| Southwest Airlines Co. | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Only in RDVY | Only in XLI |
|---|---|
| Lam Research Corporation 3.09% | CATERPILLAR INC 6.92% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. 2.99% | RTX CORP 4.98% |
| KLA Corporation 2.47% | DEERE + CO 3.18% |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.46% | UNION PACIFIC CORP 3.17% |
| The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.26% | BOEING CO/THE 3.02% |
| Bank of America Corporation 2.18% | EATON CORP PLC 2.97% |
| Ross Stores, Inc. 2.16% | UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.76% |
| The Allstate Corporation 2.16% | PARKER HANNIFIN CORP 2.20% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | XLI State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | First Trust | State Street |
| What it is | First Rising Dividend Achievers | Industrials |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.0% | +14.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.5 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.4% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 72 | 85 |
RDVY in plain words
RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 24.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLI in plain words
XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 40.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or XLI?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and XLI returned +14.3%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, RDVY or XLI?
- RDVY charges 0.47% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do RDVY and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against XLI, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-xli Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources