Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QUAL vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QUAL returned +13.1% to VONG's +1.1%; 42% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QUAL and VONG

Net assets: $48.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+13.1%
QUAL total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.15%
QUAL expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.0 points.

QUAL vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQUALVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$47.7bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common42%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund44.5%57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 691 weekly returns
QUAL VONG
Return
Total return edge VONG +444.7% +618.2%
Annualized edge VONG +13.6% +16.0%
Price return edge VONG +346.8% +527.6%
Risk
Volatility edge QUAL 16.2% 18.2%
Max drawdown edge QUAL (slight) −31.4% −32.5%
Downside capture 98.8% 99.8%
Beta 0.97 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VONG (slight) 0.75 0.80
Sortino edge VONG (slight) 1.09 1.19
Treynor 0.126 0.151
Calmar edge VONG 0.43 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.6% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.59 0.76
Information ratio 0.06 0.11
Tracking error 3.7% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: QUAL against MLRG, Jul 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VONG returned more: +618.2% to +444.7%. QUAL swung less: 16.2% to 18.2%. QUAL fell slightly less at its worst: −31.4% to −32.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QUAL vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQUALVONGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+444.7%+618.2%VONGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.6%+16.0%VONGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+346.8%+527.6%VONGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.2%18.2%QUALSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%12.3%QUAL (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.4%−32.5%QUAL (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.8%99.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture98.8%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.970.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.951.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.750.80VONG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.19VONG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1260.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.430.49VONGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.6% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.590.76Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.4% to +2.6%−0.3% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.060.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.7%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 691 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

42%

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and VONG hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

42% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QUAL VONG
APPLE 7.38% 7.65%
NVIDIA 6.28% 15.63%
MICROSOFT 8.09% 5.59%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.06% 3.83%
ELI LILLY 4.04% 2.71%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.82% 5.88%
VISA CLASS A 3.44% 1.69%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.43% 4.75%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 2.40% 1.31%
LAM RESEARCH 2.84% 1.21%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.39% 1.19%
NETFLIX 1.48% 0.85%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QUAL
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.50%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.14%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.94%
MERCK & CO INC 1.34%
LINDE PLC 1.07%
ACCENTURE PLC CLASS A 0.96%
GARMIN 0.89%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.89%
Only in VONG
Broadcom Inc 4.79%
Micron Technology Inc 3.52%
Tesla Inc 3.04%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.92%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.22%
Caterpillar Inc 1.08%
General Electric Co 0.95%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.94%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark −0.5 pts vs MLRG +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 97.2% 95.5%
Holdings 119 373
Net assets, QUAL as of Oct 28, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $48.2bn $47.1bn

QUAL and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-A7575FEB77

QUAL and VONG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. QUAL follows MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 42% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QUAL returned +13.1% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QUAL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QUAL

QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 119 positions, with the top ten at 44.5%.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +13.1% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QUAL and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QUAL against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qual-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.