Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs QUAL: how they differ

GARP and QUAL hold 46% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and QUAL hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPQUAL
APPLE5.23%7.10%
MICROSOFT5.16%7.67%
NVIDIA5.09%6.44%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A4.81%4.32%
LAM RESEARCH4.02%3.59%
VISA CLASS A4.60%3.21%
KLA3.50%2.42%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC2.33%2.81%
ALPHABET CLASS A2.28%1.94%
ELI LILLY1.53%3.62%
ALPHABET CLASS C2.17%1.53%
ARISTA NETWORKS1.31%1.46%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in QUAL
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.76%TJX 3.23%
CATERPILLAR INC 3.65%EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.35%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 2.34%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.17%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.07%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.85%
MERCADOLIBRE 2.07%ROSS STORES INC 1.41%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 2.06%MERCK & CO INC 1.40%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.90%AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC 1.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.77%COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 1.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

GARP and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPMSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%98.9%
Holdings133121

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 133 positions, with the top ten at 43.2%.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 44.4%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or QUAL?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 46% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against QUAL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/garp-vs-qual Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources