Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QTEC vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QTEC returned +29.4% to XLK's +27.1%; 40% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QTEC and XLK

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $4.6bn for First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund and $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+29.4%
QTEC total return, 1 year
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
0.55%
QTEC expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; XLK is far larger, $125.0bn against $4.6bn.

QTEC vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQTECXLK
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.4%+27.1%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Oct 6, 20265.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq-100 Technology Sector IndexTechnology Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.55%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$4.6bn$125.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund25.2%64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 12, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,067 weekly returns
QTEC XLK
Return
Total return edge XLK +1,660.9% +2,178.3%
Annualized edge XLK (slight) +15.0% +16.5%
Price return edge XLK (slight) +1,499.9% +1,646.7%
Risk
Volatility edge XLK 24.3% 20.9%
Max drawdown edge XLK −57.8% −50.7%
Downside capture 115.4% 113.0%
Beta 1.19 1.15
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLK 0.63 0.75
Sortino edge XLK 0.92 1.12
Treynor 0.128 0.094
Calmar edge XLK 0.26 0.32
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.9% a year +1.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.07 0.67
Information ratio 0.39 0.22
Tracking error 12.6% 12.6%

Each against its own benchmark: QTEC against IVV, May 12, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026; XLK against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

XLK returned more: +2,178.3% to +1,660.9%. XLK swung less: 20.9% to 24.3%. XLK fell less at its worst: −50.7% to −57.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QTEC vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQTECXLKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,660.9%+2,178.3%XLKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+16.5%XLK (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,499.9%+1,646.7%XLK (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.3%20.9%XLKSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.6%14.1%XLKLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−57.8%−50.7%XLKDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture151.5%138.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.4%113.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.191.15Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.750.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.630.75XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.921.12XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.094Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.260.32XLKAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.9% a year+1.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.070.67Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +8.2%−3.0% to +6.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.390.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error12.6%12.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,067 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

40%

By the books each fund has filed, QTEC and XLK hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

40% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QTEC XLK
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 2.61% 4.78%
Apple Inc. 2.40% 14.62%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.34% 2.67%
Intel Corporation 2.30% 2.72%
Microsoft Corporation 2.30% 11.38%
NVIDIA Corporation 2.16% 15.22%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.12% 4.02%
Broadcom Inc. 2.03% 4.70%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 2.30% 1.91%
Applied Materials, Inc. 1.89% 1.84%
Lam Research Corporation 1.75% 1.76%
Texas Instruments Incorporated 2.60% 1.65%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QTEC
Shopify Inc. (Class A) 2.47%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 2.38%
Thomson Reuters Corporation 2.38%
Strategy Incorporated (Class A) 2.33%
Astera Labs, Inc. 2.12%
ASML Holding N.V. (New York Registry Shares) 2.11%
Arm Holdings Plc 2.05%
PDD Holdings Inc. (ADR) 2.05%
Only in XLK
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.56%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.38%
ORACLE CORP 1.32%
SALESFORCE INC 1.15%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC 1.14%
AMPHENOL CORP CL A 1.13%
SERVICENOW INC 0.94%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES C 0.89%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year +29.4% +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (IVV) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark +15.7 pts vs IVV +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 80.9% 99.9%
Holdings 47 76
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $4.6bn $125.0bn

QTEC and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-04DE1A417B

QTEC and XLK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. QTEC follows Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index and XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 40% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QTEC returned +29.4% and XLK +27.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QTEC and XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QTEC

QTEC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 25.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QTEC or XLK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QTEC returned +29.4% and XLK +27.1%.
Which is cheaper, QTEC or XLK?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QTEC and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of QTEC and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QTEC against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qtec-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.