Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QQQM vs XT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QQQM returned +15.2% to XT's +22.1%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to XT's 0.46%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QQQM and XT

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and $4.1bn for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.

At a glance
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
+22.1%
XT total return, 1 year
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio
0.46%
XT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points; QQQM is far larger, $110.4bn against $4.1bn.

QQQM vs XT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQMXT
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+22.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq-100 IndexBroad innovation and megatrends
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 8.7 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.46%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$110.4bn$4.1bn
Active share vs the S&P 50069%
Holdings
Holdings in common33%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%37%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
QQQM XT
Return
Total return edge QQQM +157.2% +82.4%
Annualized edge QQQM +17.0% +10.5%
Price return edge QQQM +147.9% +63.1%
Risk
Volatility edge XT (slight) 21.0% 19.8%
Max drawdown edge Tie −35.0% −34.3%
Downside capture 99.8% 108.7%
Beta 1.00 1.11
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQM 0.70 0.44
Sortino edge QQQM 1.07 0.64
Treynor 0.147 0.103
Calmar edge QQQM 0.49 0.31
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +1.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.62 0.61
Information ratio 0.10 0.33
Tracking error 0.4% 6.5%

Each against its own benchmark: QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; XT against ACWI, Apr 2, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQM returned more: +157.2% to +82.4%. XT swung slightly less: 19.8% to 21.0%. QQQM and XT fell about the same at their worst: −35.0% and −34.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QQQM vs XT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQQQMXTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+157.2%+82.4%QQQMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+17.0%+10.5%QQQMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+147.9%+63.1%QQQMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.0%19.8%XT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.6%13.5%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.0%−34.3%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.6%123.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.8%108.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.11Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.89Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.700.44QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.070.64QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1470.103Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.490.31QQQMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+1.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.620.61Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.2% to +0.4%−2.5% to +4.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.100.33Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.4%6.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

33%

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and XT hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

33% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QQQM XT
Microsoft Corp 6.14% 4.11%
NVIDIA Corp 8.17% 3.66%
Tesla Inc 3.33% 4.45%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25% 2.62%
Alphabet Inc 2.93% 1.96%
Broadcom Inc 2.53% 1.73%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.41% 3.67%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.87% 1.33%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.21% 4.56%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.89% 1.21%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 1.18% 2.83%
Amgen Inc 1.04% 1.15%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QQQM
Apple Inc 7.88%
Alphabet Inc 2.72%
Walmart Inc 2.49%
Intel Corp 2.12%
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.89%
Applied Materials Inc 1.35%
Lam Research Corp 1.29%
Netflix Inc 1.12%
Only in XT
ELI LILLY 4.32%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.02%
ABBVIE 2.44%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.82%
MERCK & CO INC 1.66%
IBERDROLA 1.48%
NOVARTIS AG 1.40%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.27%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Tracks the Nasdaq-100 Broad innovation and megatrends
Total return, 1 year +15.2% +22.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.2% (QQQ) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs QQQ +8.7 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.46%
Already in the S&P 500 95.7% 65.5%
Holdings 105 197
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $110.4bn $4.1bn

QQQM and XT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2D38339877

QQQM and XT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index and XT follows Broad innovation and megatrends.
  2. Holdings in common. 33% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QQQM returned +15.2% and XT +22.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM and XT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XT

By weight, 66% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 197 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 8.7 pts.

Questions people ask

Are QQQM and XT in the same category?
QQQM is a stock ETF and XT is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or XT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +15.2% and XT +22.1%.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or XT?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and XT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of QQQM and 66% of XT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQQM against XT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-xt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.