Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
QQQM vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QQQM returned +15.2% to URTH's +13.1%; 40% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about QQQM and URTH
Net assets: $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
QQQM costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; QQQM is 12.5 times larger.
| Measure | QQQM | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.2% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nasdaq-100 Index | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $110.4bn | $8.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 40% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 46.7% | 27.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; URTH against ACWI, Jan 20, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.
QQQM returned more: +157.2% to +120.2%. URTH swung less: 15.5% to 21.0%. URTH fell less at its worst: −25.5% to −35.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | QQQM | URTH | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +157.2% | +120.2% | QQQM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +17.0% | +14.0% | QQQM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +147.9% | +100.5% | QQQM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 21.0% | 15.5% | URTH | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.6% | 10.2% | URTH | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −35.0% | −25.5% | URTH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 99.6% | 96.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 99.8% | 96.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.00 | 0.98 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 0.92 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.70 | 0.71 | URTH (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.07 | 1.08 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.147 | 0.109 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.49 | 0.55 | URTH | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | QQQ | ACWI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.1% a year | +0.9% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.62 | 0.79 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.2% to +0.4% | −1.4% to +3.2% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.10 | 0.16 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 0.4% | 4.5% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and URTH hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
40% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
QQQM and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM and URTH do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index and URTH follows MSCI World Index.
- Holdings in common. 40% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QQQM returned +15.2% and URTH +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
QQQM
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +15.2% and URTH +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, QQQM or URTH?
- QQQM is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QQQM against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). QQQM against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-urth
[QQQM against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.