Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SCHG vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SCHG returned +6.8% to URTH's +13.1%; 40% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SCHG and URTH

Net assets: $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.

At a glance
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
+13.1%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points.

SCHG vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHGURTH
Return
Total return, 1 year+6.8%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexMSCI World Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.24%
Net assets, SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 and URTH as of Oct 28, 2026$63.0bn$8.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.0%27.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jan 20, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 770 weekly returns
SCHG URTH
Return
Total return edge SCHG +905.2% +421.6%
Annualized edge SCHG +16.9% +11.8%
Price return edge SCHG +787.1% +296.2%
Risk
Volatility edge URTH 18.2% 15.6%
Max drawdown edge URTH (slight) −34.2% −32.7%
Downside capture 108.1% 96.5%
Beta 1.10 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG 0.85 0.68
Sortino edge SCHG 1.28 0.97
Treynor 0.138 0.109
Calmar edge SCHG 0.49 0.36
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.8% a year +0.9% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.65 0.79
Information ratio 0.40 0.16
Tracking error 5.5% 4.5%

Each against its own benchmark: SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026; URTH against ACWI, Jan 20, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +905.2% to +421.6%. URTH swung less: 15.6% to 18.2%. URTH fell slightly less at its worst: −32.7% to −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SCHG vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCHGURTHEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+905.2%+421.6%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+11.8%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+787.1%+296.2%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.2%15.6%URTHSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.2%10.9%URTHLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.2%−32.7%URTH (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture121.1%96.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture108.1%96.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.100.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.68SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.280.97SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1380.109Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.490.36SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.8% a year+0.9% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.650.79Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.7% to +3.4%−1.4% to +3.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.400.16Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.5%4.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 770 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

40%

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and URTH hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

40% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SCHG URTH
Apple Inc 9.29% 5.60%
NVIDIA Corp 10.67% 5.50%
Microsoft Corp 7.52% 4.12%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07% 2.69%
Alphabet Inc 3.97% 2.07%
Broadcom Inc 3.50% 1.70%
Alphabet Inc 3.16% 1.62%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.51% 1.49%
Tesla Inc 2.37% 1.28%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93% 1.13%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.37% 1.00%
Visa Inc 2.43% 0.73%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SCHG
General Electric Co 1.35%
Equinix Inc 0.40%
KKR & Co Inc 0.29%
Moody's Corp 0.29%
Marriott International Inc 0.29%
O'Reilly Automotive Inc 0.28%
Baker Hughes a GE Co LLC 0.24%
Moderna Inc 0.19%
Only in URTH
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.15%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.98%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 0.84%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.82%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.71%
ASML HOLDING 0.70%
WALMART 0.57%
ABBVIE 0.56%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF URTH iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year +6.8% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (IVV) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark −6.9 pts vs IVV −0.3 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 94.7% 69.1%
Holdings 192 1254
Net assets, SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 and URTH as of Oct 28, 2026 $63.0bn $8.9bn

SCHG and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-AAEB8A6000

SCHG and URTH do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index and URTH follows MSCI World Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 40% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SCHG returned +6.8% and URTH +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

URTH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

URTH

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or URTH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +6.8% and URTH +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or URTH?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 69% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SCHG against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-urth

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.