Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs SDY: how they differ

QQQM and SDY hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and SDY hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQM and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQMSDY
PepsiCo Inc0.84%1.95%
QUALCOMM Inc0.83%0.89%
Texas Instruments Inc1.05%0.74%
Microsoft Corp5.89%0.54%
Linde PLC0.95%0.49%
Automatic Data Processing Inc0.47%1.47%
Analog Devices Inc0.78%0.46%
CSX Corp0.41%0.51%
Walmart Inc2.29%0.37%
Cintas Corp0.35%0.46%
Costco Wholesale Corp1.78%0.27%
Fastenal Co0.25%0.95%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQMOnly in SDY
NVIDIA Corp 8.52%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.33%
Apple Inc 7.72%ACCENTURE PLC CL A 2.94%
Micron Technology Inc 4.90%REALTY INCOME CORP 2.12%
Amazon.com Inc 4.36%CHEVRON CORP 2.09%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.65%MEDTRONIC PLC 1.82%
Alphabet Inc 3.12%TARGET CORP 1.74%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.07%NIKE INC CL B 1.53%
Tesla Inc 2.92%KENVUE INC 1.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

QQQM and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isNasdaq-100SPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%84.6%
Holdings106157

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 106 positions, with the top ten at 47.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or SDY?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and SDY returned +11.0%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or SDY?
QQQM charges 0.15% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQM and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against SDY, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqqm-vs-sdy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources