Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to QQQM's +15.2%; 7% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and QQQM
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
Pair scorecard
QQQM costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.2 points; QQQM is 5.7 times larger.
| Measure | COWZ | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +15.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.5bn | $110.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 7% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 46.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returnsCOWZ returned slightly more: +171.9% to +157.2%. COWZ swung less: 17.3% to 21.0%. COWZ fell less at its worst: −19.2% to −35.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | COWZ | QQQM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +171.9% | +157.2% | COWZ (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +18.1% | +17.0% | COWZ (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +142.2% | +147.9% | QQQM (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.3% | 21.0% | COWZ | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.8% | 13.6% | COWZ | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −19.2% | −35.0% | COWZ | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.86 | 0.70 | COWZ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.26 | 1.07 | COWZ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.94 | 0.49 | COWZ | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and QQQM hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
7% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. COWZ follows Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
- Holdings in common. 7% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 COWZ returned +24.4% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
QQQM
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or QQQM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and QQQM +15.2%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or QQQM?
- QQQM is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-qqqm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against QQQM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-qqqm
[COWZ against QQQM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-qqqm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.