Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PVAL vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PVAL returned +26.6% to XLB's +18.5%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PVAL and XLB

Net assets: $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, and $8.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+26.6%
PVAL total return, 1 year
+18.5%
XLB total return, 1 year
0.55%
PVAL expense ratio
0.08%
XLB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLB costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.1 points.

PVAL vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePVALXLB
Return
Total return, 1 year+26.6%+18.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMaterials Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.55%0.08%
Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and XLB as of Oct 27, 2026$14.1bn$8.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common3%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.8%58.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

3%

By the books each fund has filed, PVAL and XLB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

3% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PVAL XLB
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 3.13% 5.23%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PVAL
MICROSOFT CORP 9.27%
APPLE INC 6.70%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.71%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.77%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) 3.25%
CITIGROUP INC 3.25%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.95%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.88%
Only in XLB
LINDE PLC 12.96%
NEWMONT CORP 6.56%
ECOLAB INC 4.98%
VULCAN MATERIALS CO 4.89%
NUCOR CORP 4.89%
AIR PRODUCTS + CHEMICALS INC 4.84%
STEEL DYNAMICS INC 4.77%
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO 4.73%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF XLB State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Materials
Total return, 1 year +26.6% +18.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.9 pts vs IWD not measured
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 91.4% 99.8%
Holdings 44 25
Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and XLB as of Oct 27, 2026 $14.1bn $8.1bn

PVAL and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XLB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PVAL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

XLB

XLB tracks an index of Materials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PVAL or XLB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PVAL returned +26.6% and XLB +18.5%.
Which is cheaper, PVAL or XLB?
XLB is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PVAL and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of PVAL and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PVAL against XLB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-xlb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.