Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYD vs XLB: how they differ

SPYD and XLB hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and SPYD returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYD and XLB hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYD and XLB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYDXLB
LYONDELLBASELL INDU CL A1.33%2.29%
AMCOR PLC1.29%2.75%
DOW INC1.23%2.95%
SMURFIT WESTROCK PLC1.23%3.06%
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO1.16%2.51%
MOSAIC CO/THE1.44%1.11%
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.36%0.05%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYDOnly in XLB
HP INC 1.69%LINDE PLC 12.91%
ACCENTURE PLC CL A 1.64%NEWMONT CORP 8.14%
TARGET CORP 1.46%FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 6.19%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 1.46%CORTEVA INC 5.11%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.45%AIR PRODUCTS + CHEMICALS INC 4.78%
PFIZER INC 1.44%ECOLAB INC 4.75%
AT+T INC 1.43%SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO/THE 4.70%
CHEVRON CORP 1.43%NUCOR CORP 4.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SPYD and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
XLB
State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High DividendMaterials
Total return, 1 year+12.9%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.6 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.08%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings8127

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLB in plain words

XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 59.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYD or XLB?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYD returned +12.9% and XLB returned +12.0%, so SPYD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYD or XLB?
SPYD charges 0.07% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYD and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYD and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYD against XLB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYD against XLB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spyd-vs-xlb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources