Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to XLB's +18.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and XLB

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $8.1bn for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+18.5%
XLB total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.08%
XLB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLB costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points; PULS is 2.4 times larger.

PULS vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSXLB
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+18.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMaterials Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.8bn$8.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and XLB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS XLB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in XLB
LINDE PLC 12.96%
NEWMONT CORP 6.56%
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 5.23%
ECOLAB INC 4.98%
VULCAN MATERIALS CO 4.89%
NUCOR CORP 4.89%
AIR PRODUCTS + CHEMICALS INC 4.84%
STEEL DYNAMICS INC 4.77%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF XLB State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Materials
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +18.5%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.08%
Holdings 553 25
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.8bn $8.1bn

PULS and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS and XLB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

XLB

XLB tracks an index of Materials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or XLB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and XLB +18.5%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or XLB?
XLB is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against XLB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xlb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.