Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to RSP's +16.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and RSP

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $99.8bn for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+16.0%
RSP total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.20%
RSP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PULS costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.0 points; RSP is 5.0 times larger.

PULS vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSRSP
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+16.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Equal Weight Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.8bn$99.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund2.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and RSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS RSP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in RSP
Moderna Inc 0.30%
PTC Inc 0.30%
Everpure Inc 0.28%
Illumina Inc 0.27%
Accenture PLC 0.27%
Hasbro Inc 0.26%
Mettler-Toledo International Inc 0.26%
Revvity Inc 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM Invesco
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +16.0%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +2.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.20%
Holdings 553 508
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.8bn $99.8bn

PULS and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS and RSP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

RSP

RSP tracks the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 2.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or RSP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and RSP +16.0%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or RSP?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against RSP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-rsp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.