Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and PULS
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.4 points.
| Measure | COWZ | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +4.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.5bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 95% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-puls
[COWZ against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.