Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs USFR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to USFR's +4.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and USFR
Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $17.0bn on May 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.
Pair scorecard
USFR costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.3 points.
| Measure | COWZ | USFR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +4.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and USFR as of May 31, 2026 | $19.5bn | $17.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 95% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
USFR
USFR tracks an index of Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or USFR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and USFR +4.1%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or USFR?
- USFR is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against USFR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-usfr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against USFR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-usfr
[COWZ against USFR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-usfr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.