PMBS vs SMBS: Differences, Returns & Fees
PMBS's duration was 6.3 years on Jun 30, 2026 and SMBS's 5.1 on May 31, 2026; SMBS charges 0.03% to PMBS's 0.71%. Net assets: $1.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $6.4bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF.
SMBS costs 0.68 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point.
| PMBS | SMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.71% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, PMBS as of Jun 30, 2026 and SMBS as of May 31, 2026 | $1.4bn | $6.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −2.0% | −1.0% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bloomberg US MBS Float Adjusted Total Return Index |
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Below its high | 5.9%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PMBS and SMBS hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
1% in common
On the same fields
PMBS and SMBS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PMBS in plain words
PMBS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.71% a year. It sat 5.9% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
SMBS in plain words
SMBS tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US MBS Float Adjusted Total Return Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PMBS or SMBS?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PMBS returned −2.0% and SMBS −1.0%.
- Which is cheaper, PMBS or SMBS?
- SMBS is cheaper, by 0.68 percentage points a year. That is about $68 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PMBS against SMBS, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pmbs-vs-smbs
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). PMBS against SMBS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pmbs-vs-smbs
[PMBS against SMBS (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pmbs-vs-smbs)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.