Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to VONG's +1.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and VONG

Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 54.5 points.

PDBC vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.06%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026$8.0bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and VONG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC VONG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in VONG
NVIDIA Corp 15.63%
Apple Inc 7.65%
Alphabet Inc 5.88%
Microsoft Corp 5.59%
Broadcom Inc 4.79%
Alphabet Inc 4.75%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.83%
Micron Technology Inc 3.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.06%
Holdings 1 373
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.0bn $47.1bn

PDBC and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.