Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to VGIT's −1.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and VGIT

Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $39.7bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
−1.5%
VGIT total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.03%
VGIT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGIT costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 57.1 points.

PDBC vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCVGIT
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%−1.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.03%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGIT as of Sep 30, 2026$8.0bn$39.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and VGIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC VGIT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in VGIT
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.91%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.87%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.85%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.83%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.81%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Treasury
Total return, 1 year +55.6% −1.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) −1.5% (SCHR)
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC 0.0 pts vs SCHR
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.03%
Holdings 1 103
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGIT as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.0bn $39.7bn

PDBC and VGIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

VGIT

VGIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.5% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or VGIT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and VGIT −1.5%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or VGIT?
VGIT is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against VGIT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-vgit

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.