Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to SCHP's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and SCHP

Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
−0.8%
SCHP total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.03%
SCHP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHP costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 56.4 points.

PDBC vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCSCHP
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%−0.8%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedUS TIPS
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.03%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026$8.0bn$16.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC SCHP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in SCHP
United States Treasury 4.07%
United States Treasury 4.01%
United States Treasury 4.00%
United States Treasury 3.77%
United States Treasury 3.60%
United States Treasury 3.40%
United States Treasury 3.38%
United States Treasury 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of US TIPS
Total return, 1 year +55.6% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC +0.6 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.03%
Holdings 1 48
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 $8.0bn $16.5bn

PDBC and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

SCHP

SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or SCHP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and SCHP −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or SCHP?
SCHP is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against SCHP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-schp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.