Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

NOBL vs VEA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NOBL returned +15.5% to VEA's +17.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about NOBL and VEA

Net assets: $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF, and $231.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF.

At a glance
+15.5%
NOBL total return, 1 year
+17.1%
VEA total return, 1 year
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio
0.03%
VEA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VEA costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points; VEA is far larger, $231.6bn against $10.9bn.

NOBL vs VEA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNOBLVEA
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.5%+17.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats IndexFTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$10.9bn$231.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%13.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and VEA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first NOBL VEA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in NOBL
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.81%
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.77%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.70%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.69%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.67%
CHEVRON CORP 1.66%
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.64%
Only in VEA
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2.81%
SK hynix Inc 2.30%
ASML Holding NV 2.14%
SLBBH1142 1.07%
HSBC Holdings PLC 1.05%
Roche Holding AG 0.91%
Shell PLC 0.86%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.85%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Tracks an index of Developed markets ex US
Total return, 1 year +15.5% +17.1%
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 98.3% 0.0%
Holdings 69 3906
Net assets, NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 and VEA as of Sep 30, 2026 $11.6bn $231.6bn

NOBL and VEA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

NOBL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

VEA

VEA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3,906 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or VEA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +15.5% and VEA +17.1%.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or VEA?
VEA is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NOBL and VEA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of NOBL and 0% of VEA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, NOBL against VEA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nobl-vs-vea

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.