Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IEFA vs NOBL: how they differ
IEFA and NOBL hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IEFA returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and NOBL hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IEFA | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| ROCHE PS PAR AG | 1.18% | 1.68% |
| ADMIRAL GROUP PLC | 0.05% | 1.44% |
| AEROPORTS DE PARIS SA | 0.02% | 1.60% |
| BENDIGO AND ADELAIDE BANK | 0.02% | 1.51% |
| EMERALD RESOURCES | 0.01% | 1.58% |
| Only in IEFA | Only in NOBL |
|---|---|
| ASML HOLDING 2.62% | INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.72% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.40% | BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.69% |
| SHELL PLC 1.09% | ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.69% |
| MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.00% | TARGET CORP 1.64% |
| NOVARTIS AG 0.99% | CHEVRON CORP 1.61% |
| NESTLE SA 0.97% | GENUINE PARTS CO 1.61% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.94% | MEDTRONIC PLC 1.61% |
| BHP GROUP LTD 0.91% | NUCOR CORP 1.60% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
| IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | ProShares |
| What it is | Core MSCI EAFE | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% | +9.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.5 pts | −8.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.1% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 1650 | 69 |
IEFA in plain words
IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1650 positions, with the top ten at 12.0%.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 11, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or NOBL?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so IEFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IEFA or NOBL?
- IEFA charges 0.07% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so IEFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IEFA and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEFA against NOBL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-nobl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources