Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
NOBL vs VBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NOBL returned +15.5% to VBIL's +3.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NOBL and VBILNet assets: $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF, and $12.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF.
Pair scorecard
VBIL costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.8 points; VBIL is 1.2 times larger.
| Measure | NOBL | VBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.5% | +3.7% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index | Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $10.9bn | $12.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 98% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 17.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Feb 21, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026 · 87 weekly returnsNOBL returned more: +18.2% to +6.7%. VBIL swung less: 0.1% to 12.8%. VBIL fell less at its worst: 0.0% to −9.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | NOBL | VBIL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +18.2% | +6.7% | NOBL | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +10.5% | +3.9% | NOBL | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +13.9% | +0.8% | NOBL | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 12.8% | 0.1% | VBIL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 9.2% | 0.1% | VBIL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −9.1% | 0.0% | VBIL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.54 | −0.64 | NOBL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.75 | −0.90 | NOBL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.15 | Not measured | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 87 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and VBIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
NOBL and VBIL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NOBL and VBIL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. NOBL follows S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index and VBIL follows Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 NOBL returned +15.5% and VBIL +3.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.8 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
NOBL
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.
VBIL
VBIL tracks an index of 0-3 Month Treasury Bill. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or VBIL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +15.5% and VBIL +3.7%.
- Which is cheaper, NOBL or VBIL?
- VBIL is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NOBL against VBIL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nobl-vs-vbil
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). NOBL against VBIL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nobl-vs-vbil
[NOBL against VBIL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nobl-vs-vbil)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.