Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
NMAR vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NMAR returned +13.9% to QQQ's +15.2%, and QQQ charges 0.18% to NMAR's 0.79%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NMAR and QQQ
Net assets: $47m on Oct 28, 2026 for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - Mar, and $483.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.
Pair scorecard
QQQ costs 0.61 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points; QQQ is far larger, $483.0bn against $47m.
| Measure | NMAR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.9% | +15.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 16.2% | |
| Fund price fall to the buffer | 10.1% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | QQQ | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| The outcome period | ||
| Buffer left, in index points | 15.0% of 15.0% | |
| Days left in the period | 123 | |
| Period ends | Feb 28, 2027 | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $47m | $483.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 96% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 46.7% | |
Side by side
NMAR and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQ had already risen past this fund's cap of +15.9% for the period on Oct 28, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 4.3% as the period runs out.
The fund's price can fall 10.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, QQQ can fall 16.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 123 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
QQQ
QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are NMAR and QQQ in the same category?
- NMAR is a buffer ETF and QQQ is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, NMAR or QQQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NMAR returned +13.9% and QQQ +15.2%.
- Which is cheaper, NMAR or QQQ?
- QQQ is cheaper, by 0.61 percentage points a year. That is about $61 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NMAR against QQQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nmar-vs-qqq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). NMAR against QQQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nmar-vs-qqq
[NMAR against QQQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nmar-vs-qqq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.