Which returned more over the last year, NJAN or QQQM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NJAN returned +14.0% and QQQM returned +23.0%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, NJAN or QQQM?

NJAN charges 0.79% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are NJAN and QQQM the same kind of fund?

No. NJAN is a buffer ETF and QQQM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

NJAN vs QQQM: how they differ

Over the year QQQM returned more, +23.0% against +14.0%, and QQQM charges 0.15% against 0.79%.

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - Jan and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

NJAN and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	NJAN Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - Jan	QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits	Buffer ETF	Core index fund
Issuer	Innovator	Invesco
What it is	Defined outcome, 15% on QQQ	Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year	+14.0%	+23.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+23.0%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−8.9 pts	+5.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.79%	0.15%
Holdings	not filed	106

NJAN in plain words

QQQ had already risen past this fund's cap of +14.7% for the period on Sep 13, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 4.3% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 9.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, QQQ can fall 14.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 111 days remained on Sep 13, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 106 positions, with the top ten at 47.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NJAN or QQQM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NJAN returned +14.0% and QQQM returned +23.0%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, NJAN or QQQM?: NJAN charges 0.79% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are NJAN and QQQM the same kind of fund?: No. NJAN is a buffer ETF and QQQM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NJAN against QQQM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NJAN against QQQM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/njan-vs-qqqm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources